My overall point is that high attrition rates makes rankings unreliable
The odds are low across the board so the rankings are not reliable. The odds in the first article are below 50% across the board and the highest chance in the second article was 57%. Those odds still STINK. My main argument was that recruiting are not accurate until five or six years later after all the attrition.
I had earlier reviewed all of the Tech recruits from 2000 to 2019 or so and found that roughly forty percent of the three and four star recruits did not contribute. I posted the link below and you'll see a lot of productive players for Tech were three stars. It's probably true that five stars have a higher success rate but there are not as many of them.
|
(
In response to this post by Synaesthesia)
Link: 247 Sports VT All-time top recruits
Posted: 12/11/2021 at 11:44AM